I will definitely take a look at an alternative way for dynamic variables mapping. I think it is still worth it even if it is only done by name instead of ID. You can derive from SubTree directly if you want, or you can derive from BTNodeNested<BehaviourTree> like you’ve already done in your DynamicSubTree. Implementing a custom sub-graph node (thus deriving from BTNodeNested<T>) is generally speaking easy to do with a few lines of code (depends on what you want to achieve of course). Please let me know if there is anything I can do for the next version to help you in that, apart of course from “dynamic variables mapping” which I will take a look at that possibility anyway 🙂
Thanks.
Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/97q2Rjh
Login
Register
By registering on this website you agree to our Privacy Policy.