This has been discussed a while back and the reason this happens is because the way it is implemented now, the dynamic selector (or sequencer) to interrupt the lowest priority node (right), the highest priority node (left) has to have begun its execution already. With that said, I do understand the confusion and this is high in priority to change for it to work in a more expected way!
Thank you!
Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/97q2Rjh
Login
Register
By registering on this website you agree to our Privacy Policy.